Pro-Choice Versus Pro-Life Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Pro-Choice Versus Pro-Life - Research Paper Example There is no end in sight to the pro-life versus pro-choice argument. The pro-life argument is against the practice of abortion and the legalizing of abortion. In the pro-life argument, the main point of view is surprisingly supported both by religion and science. The religious perspective is that life begins at conception. It is a gift of God and human beings do not have the right to deny this life from seeing the light of day. This makes abortion tantamount to murder. Science supports this argument through its findings that the fetus starts to display several determinants of life at a very early stage. Thus the main basis of the argument against abortion is based on the fetus as an individual life separated from that of the mother, and that it is wrong to destroy such life. It also goes on to argue that abortion is the denial of the right to life of the fetus, and by abetting abortion, society would be guilty of denial of the rights of the fetus The other perspectives against abortion include the harm that abortions cause the mother and the impact of abortions on society. Abortions are unsafe and can lead to severe complications for the woman immediately after the abortion, or in terms of long term complications, including the dreaded breast cancer. Other complications could be demonstrated at the time of delivery of a child, should the woman choose to have a baby later. The impact on society lies in two arguments. The first is the economic costs to society as a result of abortion. The second argument is that if the fetus is morally expendable, child abuse is bound to arise. Instead of abortion, avoidance of unnecessary pregnancies could be brought about through the use of contraceptives or abstinence from sexual activity. (2) Â  

Organizational Performance Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Organizational Performance - Assignment Example Usually, upon observing the extrinsically motivated employees, even the intrinsically motivated people may start to improvise on their perfection for attaining such extrinsic benefits. A manager should understand the types of motivation he should employ according to the personality of the employee and behave accordingly. The same differences can be tabulated in Appendix 1. (Quinn. S., 2010) The point where intrinsic and extrinsic motivations get exchanged is the ultimate place for job satisfaction and performance. However, this goal can never be explained arbitrarily. It has to be explained in terms of processes which have been enumerated in the following theories: Maslow’s Need Hierarchy: Every human being has 5 levels of needs, one superior to the other as explained in Appendix 2: It is the tendency of every individual to try and satisfy the needs from the bottom of the triangle to the top. Once the physiological needs get satisfied, he moves on to the security oriented needs and so on. As he starts moving higher up, the extrinsic rewards for which he was earlier motivated should be accompanied by his intrinsic motivation to achieve job satisfaction and performance. There is a natural tendency to move up and down the triangle continuously according to the circumstances. Herzberg’s theory of hygiene and motivation: Factors of hygiene contribute to the extrinsic motivation and constitute of work conveniences like good relationships with peers, supervisors, salary etc.